FANDOM


  • Hi! I know that last time I reverted vandalism, you told me that I shouldn't mention why I reverted the vandalizing edit in the edit summary. Now, I just reverted an edit, and I wanted to ask: Was my edit summary in the linked edit the sort of edit summary you wanted? If not, what should I do in the future to improve my vandalism-reverting edit summaries?

    I also wanted to mention that the account of The Blookster V2, which made the vandalizing edits that I reverted just now (as well as the vandalizing edits that I reverted the time when you warned me), seems to be used almost entirely for blatant vandalism and should probably be blocked. It's irrelevant to the main topic, but I just noticed it and you're an admin, so I thought I should let you know.

      Loading editor
    • His account has been blocked. Game is not an admin anymore, but I appreciate your efforts in reverting the vandalism. In the case of the edit summary, just leave as it is in the future as a rule of thumb. 

        Loading editor
    • Thanks for the information and for the block! I understand that for edits that revert single other edits, I should leave the edit summary as the default: "Undo revision ### by Username". However, if an edit reverts multiple other edits, as the vandalism-reverting edits that I made today did, should I leave the edit summary blank, as that is how it is by default? (I assume that's what you meant, but I want to be really clear about this.)

        Loading editor
    • Sure.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.