User blog comment:Memphis the light/Fresh call./@comment-27765057-20121209174854/@comment-1272757-20121209193803

"Vote on what evidence is presented and nothing more."

And I have to admit, I see what you mean Skull. A confidence call isn't about whether or not an admins actions were just or not; it's about whether or not those actions prove they are incompetent and unable to continue doing their job. The evidence presented here really does next to nothing to say or prove anything about my competency. Perhaps Guy knew that he would be singling me out if he called corruption when all the evidence (as stated before) directly involves at least one other admin's involvement, and decided to instead use the community's apparent lack of faith in me instead. A lack of faith which I genuinely have no idea why it started or came about. I mean the corruption call concept was created when he was still around, so I'm certain he was aware of the distinction. But who knows; I'd rather not bother trying to play conspiracy theorist.