Board Thread:Help and Support/@comment-5176144-20140127015352/@comment-5176144-20140127081204

HauntedPhantom wrote: Legorulez49 wrote: TheDarkMantis15 wrote:

Legorulez49 wrote:

TheSkullWolf wrote: Legorulez49 wrote: TheSkullWolf wrote: Legorulez49 wrote: TheSkullWolf wrote: Legorulez49 wrote: TheDarkMantis15 wrote:

Legorulez49 wrote: Exactly, I SHALL NEVER MAKE ANOTHER PAGE UNTIL THAT CODE GETS PUT BACK ON THE SITE, WHO'S WITH ME!? That's a bit extreme...

And you can still create new articles, you'll just have to do them all from scratch now. Nope, I'm sorry but I'm keeping my promise, either we get that code back or else I will confront Game myself!!! Saying you aren't going to make articles anymore isn't going to convince Game to bring coding back. Heck, he got rid of his own pages the same day he got rid of the coding. Well, I hope he sees this because this wiki is going to turn to GARBAGE without that tempelate! I highly doubt that. All it did was make it so that you didn't have to look at the article policy constantly while you were making your page. Keep believing that, but I assure you that future pages will be GARBAGE with out of order layouts and confusing boxes, I mean don't you think it would've been just a LITTLE helpful for new users!? We had to make pages BEFORE Game made that coding, and most of the pages looked perfectly fine. Yeah trying to get me to make pages WITHOUT the template by LYING isn't going to do the trick, sorry bud. I don't think Skull is lying at all.

The hostility is uncalled for, I think. I SAY REMOVING THAT TEMPLATE WAS UNCALLED FOR!!!!!!!! Suck it up and move on, it's not the end of the world. If we do get bad pages we mark them for standards/deletion, easy enough. Also, if you haven't noticed, Game joined in 2012, while the wiki was created farther back, so obviously the code wasn't there since the wiki was created, and the reason for this is because people can create pages just fine without a premade layout. I'm sorry, but not having a page template would lead people to make EVEN MORE garbage pages, and they would be WORSE because the text could get all scattared around whereas with the template you had something good to build off of, all I'm saying is that it wasn't necassary to remove the article template AT ALL.