Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-27765057-20140105231113/@comment-5142578-20140107215358

I know I already mentioned this on chat, but I'll say it here again so everyone can read it for themselves.

I'm not a hundred percent on board with this idea, but I don't necessarily hate it either. I think there is room for improvement. For example, rather than doing one article per month, I think it should be at least five articles per month (Like top 5 articles per month). The reason I say that is because there are so many more articles than users. I mean, like a "1 user per 200+ articles" ratio. So, I think naturally it would be a good idea to have more than just one article examined per month.

Second, I think there should be a rule for what articles are given the spotlight. The rule I have in mind is that a user shouldn't have his/her article put up for vote if he/she has already had an article win the spotlight in the past month or two. This would give more users a chance to have their work noticed. I mean, there's nothing wrong with a particular user making amazing articles one after the other, but if they have their articles featured every time, that takes away an oppertunity for other users' work to be noticed.