User blog comment:Wh!te$tar/Revision to the Corruption Call/@comment-1617565-20120828214303

Well, while I feel I surely shouldn't have a vote because I'm not truly active on this wiki, I'll still make my opinion heard on the matter:

Adding the option for users to remove admins they don't really have any confidence in is a good idea.

Why?

Because when the majority of the wiki does not have faith in an administrator (and 2/3 is a majority) then they do not truely respect said administrator. As the admins are the leaders of the wiki, they should have the respect of the public, and such respect makes the admin's words all the more powerful.

Why?

Because when the public truly respects their leader, they take the word of the leader to heart, any orders given by said leader are more likely to get done because the public feel that they can trust the leader. Remove said respect and the public finds the leader's order annoying and unnecessary, and thus are much less likely to carry the orders out to their full potential, causing the system to deteriorate and eventually break/turn on itself.

In summation I support this idea because I believe that a respected leader is ineffective while the opposite is true for a respected one, but do not feel my vote should count due to my inactivity. I have posted this comment simply to share my line of thinking with those who are more active in hopes that it helps the wiki better itself.

Future Sailor Gallant out.