User blog:Wh!te$tar/It's called "Checks and Balances"

So, you guys are bringing up the "Admins are drunk with power" problem again. I agree to an extent. There is too much power in admin hands, and users can't do much if they go overboard. Well, I have a compromise. On SFCW, I though of giving users the right to call "corruption" on admins. Here's the excerpt from our policies: So, for or against?
 * Users have the right to call "corruption" on any member of staff. Calling Corruption is the act of accusing a member of SFCW staff of being unfit for service. Once Corruption is called, a blog shall be set up as soon as possible by a third party, in which users may discuss the charge and express "For" "Against" and "Neutral" on the demotion. Users may only call "corruption" once per staff member, once per 6 months. Repeatedly calling corruption on a specific administrator after charges have been met with the same results multiple times may be met with a warning or ban for disturbing peace.