Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-209421-20130314105636/@comment-1272757-20130315051337

I wanna clarify something, since it's been brought up repeatedly.
 * 1) Xi's corruption call wasn't legitimate to begin with, because his corruption call required that I break policies or otherwise abuse my adminship. He gave no example for his corruption call and I had done nothing to warrant it, so in the end it fell flat. That lead to White's "confidence call" suggestion that was eventually taken up to deal with competence rather than corruption.
 * 2) Guy's call was a confidence call, based on whether or not the community believed I was a competent admin based on the evidence he brought up. Said evidence was the result of my actions against "Shousenka", repeatedly telling him to not try and undermine the group admin decision that got Guy banned in the first place. And yes, I did threaten punishment should he continue to try and stir up trouble by bringing up the subject. And here we are now, with the knowledge that it was really Guy using a sockpuppet to not only evade his ban, but also try and get himself unbanned.

I've been trying to avoid getting more involved than necessary because everyone knows how I feel about how I lost my adminship, especially since I lost it over a very small number of votes that would have been nullified with just one or two votes in my favor. I didn't want to make myself look bad by pushing this one way or another. But I felt the need to make these clarifications.

Either way, I have the full ability to run for adminship again one way or another. At this current point the matter is more how many strikes I'll have on my record, rather than whether or not I should get my adminship back after this little revelation.