User blog comment:Wikikinetic/Winter Awards 2018: Wiki's Votes/@comment-4988763-20180308223722

Any sort of criticism is valid, but...

Regarding Arna:


 * I understand about liking articles that only keep things neutral. It is but a stylistic choice. However, what is mentioned in the Physical Description section is brought up in canon. If it was mere random subjective trivia as you say, it would appear in the Fun Facts section.
 * I'm not sure about which prose error you mentioned in her Personality section. I never thought something like that could actually annoy anyone to the point of ruining everything else written for them. Identifying it would greatly help me clarify things better.
 * At face-value for a first-time reader of my pages, I can see how her short, fast-paced History can get confusing to an extent, as many of the events described (the mafia, Emerald School's collapse, her relations with Ramonna and Mira, Mira's disappearance after her defeat, why Arna cannot actually remember facing Mira before due to mind-control) are more thoroughly explained in other pages and the series itself. But having many events that keep contradicting each other? Identifying them would greatly help me.
 * The Creation and Development section is just me sharing my thoughts on how the character came to be concept-wise. It is not an actual aspect of the character at all, so criticizing it on a category titled "Best Character" with the same weight as the History and Powers section personally is questionable. To an extent, it feels like it is the equivalent of disliking a drawing because its speed-paint video had an unfitting song.