User blog comment:Smash The Echidna/SFW Summer Awards 2015/@comment-7637833-20150629161007/@comment-26037781-20150629200943

Now I'm gonna say this without being much of a jerk or a d**k in the matter

Thing is, when I look through your votes, Cosenza, sorry, but it looks like you only looked at the picture and read the first paragraph instead of the whole thing. When you voted, most of them were something that I couldn't relatively agree on, and I'm sorry for it, but for one character being like Dante, even when the page says he was inspired by him, you throw it out claiming that he's so much like Dante.

Here's where I put my other bits and bobs


 * Heroes don't lead people all the time.
 * Heroes can be as little as someone being a villager doing a mundane task that could be a very big difference.
 * Heroes can be just one person who could actually make a big impact on things even if it seems that they can't.
 * Heroes can be anyone, and anything. From a simple dog rescuing someone. To a boy staying behind at work, making everything is done properly. They don't always lead.


 * Lawfuls kill people, Lawful Evils especially, but even Lawful Goods kill. Lookit Paladins, they kill the undead. They don't always imprison people.
 * Even we in a Lawful setting had put Tsarnaev on trial, and had gave him the death penalty, done through the most Lawful of methods we have, the judicial system. Do I agree with it personally? No.

BUT.

Thing is, I don't even know if these were serious votes, or if you had simply just looked and skimmed without doing much. Most of your votes seem to be just one sentence. Or even one word alone, sorta eluding the feel of 'critical' as you claimed that you put, and instead, feeling half-done and lazily said. Sorry if this offends you.

Now, I admit. Personally? Yes. I'm not fond of Mantis on occasion, nor am I fond with how DMC had turned out as of late. Is he a cool person? Undoubtedly. But I cast my feelings aside and I look over the Blitz profile, not letting my personal bias take root in giving an honest vote.

It notes how he was inspired by Dante, that's given. But we all take inspiration from things, even me on some parts. Solar has numerous inspirations when I made him. But when I look through the page.

No mention of Demons or Devils.

At all.

Weapons? Yes. They seem a bit similar to Dante, the coat too is red, but with the amount of content on this page, it's as long as Solar's own. Barely do I see a page like that. Most of the other heroes? I've seen how they were portrayed, and were written. Tye (No offense) is only an eighth or ninth as big. So this is the case where I think you went tl;dr.

Again, sorry if that offended you.

But when I look through Blitz's page. I see myself in it, honestly. I see someone who strove to stand out, put as much effort as they could in the character that they've written. Being someone who's won first ever featured article and user, I myself would say that the page would get my vote were I active in these little... festivities. But that aside.

One of your votes was inappropriate, Madam Weiss' specifically. “I'd tap that” was something that isn't even fit here, even if you said 'just kidding'.

Some of your votes were lazily done just saying “Same as above” or being one or two worded comments. And that's that.


 * Tl;dr
 * I find it hard to see as how these votes could actually be held accountable for in any reason. I'm sorry if this offends you, but even critics need to criticize critics. I do hope that you take what I've said in consideration, and honestly? It isn't done because you're unpopular. And things change with time, sure, Nikki's votes were held accountable, but now? We're going to see to it as a community that these votes are done properly and not so effort is wasted. But above all, so the community improves in it's creativity.

Have a good day..

--Sol