User blog comment:Detective SkullWolf/Whelp, I Done Goofed/@comment-27765057-20141124040740/@comment-27765057-20141124151828

Pretending to be someone else is a lie in itself. And before you come at me saying "I can't use sockpuppets as evidence against you", that was also meant for the sockpuppets used to request an appeal. However, knowing you, you will also tell me that "I did not specify that little note in the policy", so let me throw myself a bone here, since I would only be able to use evidence back in 2010 against you otherwise and I have not had the opportunity to interact with your main account then and the majority of my interactions are with you as a sockpuppet: "Any sockpuppet that was used (not specifically at the time of creation) with some ulterior motive (and by that I mean outside of evading a ban and not just some action that is easily dismissible, such as trying to get an appeal for the main account) in mind is one of those rare exceptions."

Does this sound fair?

If so, then I'm bringing the Shousenka account as evidence toward my rejection of this appeal, pointing out that you had planned to become a chat moderator with this account. If you had merely continued using this account for the purpose of getting your Guy account unbanned, then I would likely be wavering more on the side of approving this appeal right now. However, you tried to use that sockpuppet, pretending to be someone else entirely (and yes, I know that you would have likely have been banned had you not done so), to cheat the system and get into power again. Not only that, you were rather rude to me at one point in that account, coincidentally around the same time, a time in which I was running for chat moderator for the first time (in case you ask, I'm not butthurt. I'm glad to use whatever ammo I have against you).

Someone who does this does not leave a good impression on me at all, and therefore I shall stick with my rejection of this appeal. Have a nice day and don't be so quick to assume I am full of lies.