Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-3002957-20150330222252/@comment-26037781-20150414192419

Monk the Cat wrote: I have a few things to say about this;

Firstly, while many users are in chat and not editing, closing the chat at times wouldn't really do much toward making them edit pages. They'd just find something else to do for the times it was closed.

I think it'd just piss them off too if we did that, so I agree with Monk here.

For the third part, I don't really have anything more to write. But I do agree. People lack incentive, not just to make pages, but overall edit or revamp them into something better. Just a few days ago I tried to convince someone to revamp their character so her character wouldn't be that judged. While asking for help, they refused to change the character at all. And the page was in dire need of a major revamp, mainly that of appearance, spelling, and grammar. Now I for one can understand poor grammar and what not. I still understood this person whereas others had noted that they couldn't understand much.

But incentive is perhaps one of the main things here on that.

I've something to add to Monk's second, we also had RPers that would mainly derail the idea of the RP. On the Chat, it was sorta on my tradition if the whole chat was split on what RP we should do, we voted. It was overwhelmingly for a peaceful RP, yet an RPer that wanted it to be an adventure and survival RP had entirely shifted the peaceful RP to be the RP that he wanted it to be. It was so predictable to the point that my character literally started making bets on what'd happen.