Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-1272757-20130627003540/@comment-1272757-20130711064739

Gamedezyner wrote: Kagimizu wrote: I actually have a few objections. When I wrote the concept of three options being outright deletion, community assistance, or leaving an article in-tact, the second option didn't pertain to changing grammar and sentence structure.

Instead, it's meant to represent the stance "the article is low quality, but salvageable. Someone can help the creator make the content more reasonable and of higher overall quality". For example, I once helped Lightning make some changes to her character Selenia.

When I wrote this it was indeed about fixing an entire article, not specific sections or aspects. On almost ALL of the pages that are going to come up, the creator will more than likely be long gone from this wiki, or they will deny the assistance. Remember what we're dealing with here. The ones who can't meet the standards are usually the ones who don't bother to try.

If the creator is long-gone and never coming back, then the article may as well be deleted regardless. This idea is more focused on dealing with articles created by newbies that while meeting quantity and writing standards, fall far below any standards on quality of content. Some articles or Users may deserve a chance at reworking and altering their character, without starting from scratch. That way there's a middle ground between deletion or leaving it alone completely.