Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-4748628-20150525013604/@comment-10690212-20150609050135

But then, I really do like the way Akrivus thinks. Have you ever tried an approach where you forego the quality control for articles entirely (leaving quality assurance up to the roleplayers who establish their own rules for their RP's, i.e. people will make pages that fit in the rules or be unable to roleplay) and simply focus on moderating problem behavior? You know, busting the people who go around cursing up a storm and disrupting roleplays, chats, etc. The more I think about it, the more I realize that monitoring the articles themselves may be a lost cause because it's a job that never ends-the cleanup's gone on for years, and 6000 fixed/deleted pages later the problem persists to the point where debates like the one above us keep popping up.

I dunno, I thought I'd fling the idea out there. Maybe when the wiki really starts to get clogged up again you can delete pages from users who've been inactive for a couple years. I'm just feeling that if the whole bit about the wiki's reputation gets discarded, then most standards (other than protecting against questionable/mature content) will be made irrelevant because the wiki will be driven by fun. Do what you want in the end-I think this is the last bit I have to say about fanon wiki policies.