Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-1272757-20130627003540/@comment-4748628-20130709152536

Flashfire212 wrote: None here, as long as we make it clear that we focus on specific sections and not entire articles with too little content. Those should still be deleted, but poorly written articles that have decent content or need scripting repairs are defiantly important.

That raises a second point - aside for grammar, would the fixing of miused templates and resizing of distorting images count into this? Absolutely, however a lot of that can be handled without putting an article through this process. If you see an improperly formatted template or one with broken code, oversized images, too many lines, etc. You are free to fix it anyway as long as you don't actually alter the content.

Side Note: Many people don't know, but Template:NewInfoBox has a new line function in it for lists. If you notice a lot of pages that have it, you'll see some of the infoboxes take up the whole page. That's because of the amount of entries they put in for Friends, Family, etc. If you were to simply put ";;" after each one, it creates a new line in the infobox, giving you a proper list, keeping the infobox the right size.