Roleplay talk:Nothing/@comment-34754462-20180414175320/@comment-32712012-20180415004210

That makes sense. I must say, I admire the fact that you're trying to balance out being funny and actually protecting the younger users of the site, so thanks for that! :)

I have one question and two suggestions on this: Thanks in advance for any answers on this!
 * Suggestion 1: Instead of saying "Is Not Recommended for Audiences Under 13 Because of [insert reason here]", could we write ""Is Not Recommended for Audiences Under 13 Due to [insert reason here]"? I think that would be a bit shorter and look a bit better. (If you want to keep it the other way, though, that's also fine with me.)
 * Suggestion 2: I'd like if we could make it a bit clearer why users shouldn't click the link while still not saying anything that would negate the protection that we're trying to avoid by adding the tag. So while we obviously wouldn't say, for example, what bad language something uses, I'd much prefer that we write "Is Not Recommended for Audiences Under 13 Due to Bad Language" than writing "Is Not Recommended for Audiences Under 13 Due to Language", since, after all, everyone speaks, and so writing "Due to Language" is not that helpful.
 * Question: Which items were you suggesting that we add the tags to, and why? The only one of your references that I completely looked at was Go Google It, which it might be a good idea to add a warning to for "Sexually Suggestive Content", but I wouldn't know if there was something wrong with any of your other references. Therefore, I'd like if you could tell me if there was something inappropriate in I Gotta Believe, Osana Najimi, or Triple Baka, and, if so, what general category, so that I can tag them respectively. (I'm pretty sure that there's nothing that needs to be tagged in my references, which is why I'm not mentioning them.)