Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-27765057-20140209155315

This policy seems to only address admins. But what about chat moderators? Can't a chat moderator by the same definition become corrupt? We need to write a process for dealing with the possibility of corrupt moderators. My suggestion? As for the requirements, just reuse the one for admin and replace the word admin with moderator (Except for the second rule).  
 * In a "Corruption Call", the offending moderator must have broken a policy involving the treatment of Users on the chat. The accuser must provide photographic evidence that proves that the moderator has indeed broken policies. If the evidence is found to be forged, the accuser will face punishment and the call will be dropped without further debate.
 * In a "Confidence Call", there must be reasonable evidence that the called moderator is unable to do their job effectively or competently (Example: They are inactive for extended periods of time without warning) Said call must be verified and ruled as reasonable by two moderators in order to be followed through.