Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-4748628-20180213025040/@comment-4988763-20180218204933

“Quality standards?” I rest my case.

I don’t know about you, but I certainly wouldn’t want my pages to be archived ten years after I leave merely because the newer userbase thinks my content is garbage despite following all conventional standards put forth now. Who would peer-review 9,000+ articles to make sure every page is up to some sort of quality standard so they don’t get removed with the rest? The elitist aspect of it all is a point Akrivus made already.

We do not necessarily demand for users to produce actual quality content, but merely to adhere to the policy regarding article creation (minimum of two paragraphs, no explicit content, no jokes in poor taste, no spam, etc). The point is to share and create Sonic-related content. Unfinished content would be not meeting these very lenient criteria, not because one did not decide to include details in their descriptions.

Don’t mistake what I am saying, though. I never said what you did went beyond a proposal. I’m saying that your reasoning for it makes me worried about your intentions with the wiki going forward. And that is all.