User blog comment:Memphis the light/Might get hated on, but here we go./@comment-209421-20141203043111

Despite everything that has happened, I hold no ill will towards Guyviroth. Hell, do you realize how he became an administrator the first time? I CHOSE HIM. I put forward a message to Wikia Staff saying that we had no active admins back when we had only one thousand articles and a troll infestation, and recommended four users be promoted. Of those, only two are frequent users, and I use frequent with distance - Guyviroth, who continuously returns with sockpuppets, and myself.

I'm not saying that Guy is perfect. He's often come across as arrogant and willing to flaunt the rules to make his point. He's headstrong. But, at the same time, we have users here who have done other negative things, and we accept them. As Memph said, he was Evilagram, and now look at him.

I've always had respect for Guy's abilities to critique work, and the way his mind works around creating characters and problems said characters face. But, let me be clear - He has violated the rules. And, as Skull so eloquently put, this policy was made to appeal unjust bans, not award second chances.

But, I quote from Skull, who sums up my opinion as well as his own: "...his ban log does not specify what exactly Guyviroth did to violate his probation..."

I was there when he was banned. Pretty much every time, in fact. But, I don't recall the precise details as to why he was banned. As admins, we need to keep the logs updated with the exact reasons. So, this appeal is as much giving Guy another chance as it is an opportunity to encourage the admins to keep the details updated. So, again,