Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-1272757-20130627003540/@comment-5142578-20130705154135

Gamedezyner wrote: Guys, talk about the topic, not the bad articles.

The topic is deciding whether or not an article should be removed for poor quality, even if they "meet" the standards, right? *clears throat* Well, I'll try.

The page I gave as an example, Bianca the Cat, is pratically nothing more than a duplicate of Blaze the Cat. What's worse is that I have read Blaze's article page and Bianca's seems to have just been a copy and paste (with some very minor changes to names, places, etc). As far as quality goes, it has none because it mostly stole it from another existing page. The only things it didn't steal were her history (which is disappointingly short), her appearance (at least the author admited that the picture was a recolor), and her relations(which consist of a large number of characters both canon and fanon alike). What's interesting is that a character named "Sinic" (which is probably the author's version of Sonic) is listed throughout the article, but not even mentioned in the "relations" segment of the article.

My final decree: Two thumbs down for unoriginality and lack of good quality. WAY DOWN. I don't know if this warrents a nomination for deletion. I'll leave that to the admins.