User blog comment:Memphis the light/Might get hated on, but here we go./@comment-27765057-20141203032520

This is a very difficult decision for me to make.

Part of me wants to completely go for the appeal on the following sentences alone. I feel that Guy is a potentially useful user to have around. Heck, he may even deserve another chance like everyone seems to be insinuating, though I honestly cannot say because not only did I not know him when he was "public enemy number one" (although he technically still holds that title to some people), but I'm also still trying to affirm an consistent opinion on his character as a whole.

However, I feel the need to remind everyone that I never made this policy with the intent to appeal bans based off of whether someone deserves another chance. I made this policy to appeal bans based off of evidence that they were unjustified in the first place. I implore you all to vote with that in mind, but I will not further sway your decision aside from this suggestion.

With that in mind, let me just refresh everyone's memory in that the ban that Guy currently has on his belt is for violating his probation. The probation in question was for the sake of testing a policy that, as of now, does not exist and was never voted on or adjusted after the test was considered a failure and Guy was given his ban. However, his ban log does not specify what exactly Guyviroth did to violate his probation, and while Kagi certainly does help out by pointing out the things he did during his probation, I'd rather hear from Memph himself.

Until then, I vote for the appeal as Guy actually does have a legitimate case to lean on toward his ban being unjustified.