Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-27765057-20141030002853/@comment-27765057-20141031025347

Gamedezyner wrote: A couple things. TheSkullWolf wrote:

a randomly-chosen user with an edit count of at least 300 and having been around for at least three months will vote in their place. We need something else. Any ideas, then? There's not really a standard to determine a user's competence, other than simply knowing that user very well. If you are thinking of it like that, then I suppose we could have a list of users that we feel are competent enough for the task and randomly have a user pulled from it whenever we need an extra voter.
 * 1) I don't like the randomly chosen idea at all.
 * 2) 300 edits or three months means nothing about the user's competence.