Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-5518179-20160721144911

So, in the past couple years, we've got a couple new staff positions that I'd like to address. This doesn't need much explanation so I'll get to what I believe are the requirements. You're probably now wondering why their both lower than the chat mod requirement, that's what I will get to now. Now you're also wondering why rollbacks are harder to get, so let's knock down the last domino. Trusted users basically means a user that one or two admins can agree are good enough for this position.
 * Content Moderator, an admin who is barred from using disciplinary force and can edit, protect, and delete pages, call it akin to our old cleanup team.
 * Discussions Moderator, a chat moderator with the ability to moderate the forums too.
 * Content Moderators will follow the same requirements as administrators, except for a couple changes, Content Moderators will require 800 edits and will not be expected to deploy disciplinary action (since they can't) in the face of rules being broken.
 * Discussions Moderators will follow the same rules as chat moderators, except they'll lower their edit count to 500 and their administrative presence includes the forums.
 * Chat Moderators will now drop their edit requirement to 200 edits, simply because the chat should be treated as a separate entity politically and edits don't necessarily matter.
 * Before anyone says "that means everyone will be chat moderator," I counter that statement with the fact that we're not looking for any chat moderators right now, unless chat activity in the morning suddenly increases.
 * All admins are rollbacks, they already have the ability to roll back edits, therefore the only staff in need of rollback positions are discussion and chat moderators.
 * Because rollbacks are an unimportant position, and to add, nobody even knows how to use the position, rollbacks should only be given to trusted users provided they ask.

Now that the proposed rules are out, I'm going to consider this half vote based and half discussion based, if I see enough in agreement with the first two position's rules, I will add it with any revisions are actively agreed with, the same will go for the last two rules. In the meantime, I will answer any questions anyone has to ask and I expect the other agreeing admins and moderators to do so as well.

Thank you! 