User blog comment:E-113:Xi/Corruption/Confidence Amendment/@comment-4748628-20121228194840

I have two issues with this... The accuser and accused may not converse anywhere on the wiki throughout the duration of the Call. If any user witnesses the two conversing on the wiki, it must be reported immediately to another administrator or bureaucrat.
 * To be honest, I find this a bit silly. It's unnecessary and difficult to manage.

A single authority figure may only be called out once every three months.
 * This needs to be rewritten. This presents a HUGE loophole. I don't think there should be a time limit between them. Instead it should be that you cannot repeat a call. In other words, you can't call an admin out for something that was already settled by a previous call.

I'd also like to suggest that the accused or accuser may not post on the call page(s) unless specifically addressed or questioned. This is to prevent attempts to "sway" the perception of the users voting.