Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-1272757-20130627003540/@comment-4748628-20130711075328

Kagimizu wrote: That sounds good. Being able to handle a case-by-case basis will make it easier to weed out the articles that are wastes of space will allowing articles with potential to grow and flourish.

However, I do think quality review should be usable on RPs as well, and not just basic articles. At any time, if a user should come across an article a page that meets standards, but is of questionable content or quality, they may submit it to an administrator, who can then decide whether or not to put the article page up for a vote.

Once up for voting, users can vote between 3 options: The votes from each participating user will be counted, and the winning action will be taken on the article page in question.
 * Delete the article  page
 * Fix the article page as a community
 * Leave the article page as is