User blog:Shousenka/Whiners about Standards Marking

So Gamedezyner has made aware to me that some people were not fond of me marking pages; some believe that some of my markings were unjust or people think I've not read their article fully. Especially in terms of construction standards.

Now let me say this now; construction standards is no longer an immunity status; it has minimum requirements and a limit to three weeks. Let me outline these minimum standards;


 * Needs an infobox with or without info
 * Needs at least three headings with or without info
 * needs at least three categories that isn't "Unfinished Pages" or "Stale Construction Pages" etc; they need actual categories.

Every article I've marked that has a construction page either has expired the three week immunity, or has not met one of those minimal requirements; it even says in the template the reason why it has standards. If you want to appeal, feel free to link your page below and I will respond as to why it was marked in depth, or remove the template if I was wrong (which is some cases I probably was; I'm only human afterall).

And seriously, if you really care that much, just ****ing make your page up to standards for God's sake. It's not hard.