Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-1272757-20130627003540/@comment-209421-20130709122844

Frost the Wolf wrote: Gamedezyner wrote: I strongly disagree with that thought process. Just because anyone can edit a page, doesn't mean they should. If someone changed any of my characters in a manner they thought superior, I would still get on their case for editing my stuff without permission. That's why the owner should at least have some choice in the matter. Either way, the article is either improved or simply deleted. Basically a win-win, right? When I say "Fix the Article as a Community", that's mostly only meant for articles with seriously sub-par grammar or sentence structure. I'm not talking about entirely rewriting someone's character because we think they're a bit of a god-mod. So, it would be like taking a section of the article (or maybe even a majority of the article) that has only about one or two sentences, poor sentence structure, and not enough description, and improving it?

For example....

Original edit: So-and-so is a quiet and shy person, She also is helpful and has a sense of honor.

Community edit: This character is normally quiet and shy when it comes to meeting other people. She prefers to stay out of group activities and keep to herself. However, when someone looks to be in need of help, she will do her best to assist that person. She also has a strong sense of honor, and simply hates it when others act deceitful or break their promises.

Is that along the lines of what you were thinking? Well, I dunno about Kagi or Game, but that fits my line of thought.