Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-7637833-20160629182514/@comment-1942179-20160729011326

Oy, these loopholes are going to give me a headache sooner or later. This would be so much easier to explain if I could find that one picture I wanted to use as an example for what I meant. But still, I think you're misunderstanding my point. I think you're taking all of this too much at face value.

Smash The Echidna wrote: Official Artwork that has only been altered to change colors is forbidden. (Unless it is stated to be a fanon-alteration to a canon character: i.e a new super transformation for Sonic. This is up for debate)

This addresses those lazy blobs of color you're talking about. If someone splattered color on everything but the pose (that doesn't even sound right) that falls under this rule here.

Smash The Echidna wrote: Official Artwork that has been slightly edited (i.e adding bangs, eye-lashes, lipstick, etc.) is forbidden. (This is up for debate)

This also includes the aforementioned color changes.

Smash The Echidna wrote: Official Artwork that has been transformed to the point where the only recognizeable feature is the pose itself is up for debate. Perhaps this does need to be explained in more detail. But know that if someone haphazardly splattered color over it to this point, it would ultimately fall under the first rule.

As for quality control, we'll cross that bridge when/if we get there. We've already been talking about people on quality control, anyway.