Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-7637833-20160313215658/@comment-3536189-20160319204531

@Sol I agree to this 100%. If this rule passes, then this site becomes more of a joke than it already is. Limiting the level of constructive criticism only encourages the lack of creativity, and prevents people from being able to improve even further. Not to mention that this site here is already the butt-end of a joke, similar to the franchise it's themed on, and further limiting constructive criticism only makes its reputation even lower than it already is.

There's this thing that exists in constructive criticism that's proven to be effective (as shown in The Bad Webcomics Wiki) known as Ad Hominem, which is about making more harsher criticism as part of satire, which further helps artists to improve on their crafts overtime (the people behind Exterminatus Now are perfect example of that case). Removing Ad Hominem from this sites not only encourages laziness and lack of creativity (like with Tom Preston and Chris Chan), but further pushes its reputation deeper in the hole than it already has.

If the staffs and the members here were smart enough, the staffs wouldn't put that petition to begin with, and the members should be voting against that to not put more dent on the site's reputation. But who am I kidding? This is the Sonic fanbase, where people hate being proven wrong and being given constructive criticism.