Board Thread:Article Discussion/@comment-4883076-20130612171203/@comment-3978591-20130915112559

Frost the Wolf wrote: Ah, that reminds me of something that I've been meaning to ask, following along the same ideas. You see, I've been in a RP or TP battle where one character was supposedly controling my character's powers. Let me give you an example.

Let's say Pyrokinetic 1 launches a fire ball at Pyrokinetic 2. From Pyro 2's user's point of view, his character should be able to cause the fire ball to dissipate by merely snapping his character's fingers because Pyro 2 is pyrokinetic. However, Pyrokinetic 1's user states that should be possible because her character created that fire ball and, therefore, is under her character's control.

So the point is, if two characters share the same ability (i.e. Pyrokinesis), is it LOGICAL (or even fair) for one character to pratically disable the opponents ability based attacks just because he/she has that same ability? I know i'm coming in late on this but i saw this and i near about flipped my shit...

NO...NO IT IS NOT. Freaking hell i hate it when i hear about this stupid BS. It's not even fair in the slightest.