User blog comment:Hunter1034/Admins/@comment-5136106-20111107195918/@comment-1349273-20111108221208

@Hunter; You're partially right. But put it this way; this Wiki couldn't be more further from the "unbiased american judical system" even if it became the new North Korea. Case in point, the recent case with me, Onyx and Saberleo. Further point, being the fact I've had 12 bans, only two were justified. Now considering from what I've seen admins like to swing hammer, ask questions later, I can't agree that our current admins can hold that standard. I believe only Memph can do that.

Now secondly, admins boil down to a simple directive; monitor what their administrating. Considering that at the moment this consists of "the whole wiki", that makes things not as controlled as it should be. Are the admins doing a relatively good job? Possibly. But I believe this is down to the fact that the admins are very inexperienced, having only been nominated through popularity alone, and the fact that the policies are too restrictive.