Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-29956848-20160126015852/@comment-29956848-20160128010046

Akrivus wrote: PowerMouse wrote: Akrivus wrote: I think that bans should be discussed, as in, you would use that system for the initial ban, and if discussion seems necessary by the moderator or anyone else, admins/mods can discuss it on chat or on Skype to get a final ban result. Initially I wasn't going to respond because I was unsure of what to say. I just don't really see how that would be necessary, I guess? I don't know, maybe I'm not much of a team player. Don't apply rules to this, but let's say someone linked porn in the main room and a bunch of user PMs and he got banned for two hours. Admins/mods, if they feel it be necessary, can discuss prolonging that ban and doing so. It isn't necessary, but it would help it so the system isn't so adherent to those ban rules.

What I'm saying is we need some gut instinct to be used a lot, rather than using the rules, some people deserve a ban for doing something more than the other person who did the same thing. I was always under the assumption that that was an unwritten rule of chat, hence my recent ban of WaterKirby for a month.