Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-1272757-20130627003540/@comment-4748628-20130627004334

While I support the concept, this must go: Kagimizu wrote:

The process is simple: an admin will bring up an article considered to be of low quality to their fellow admin peers. The admins will then examine its overall quality and decide whether it is allowable, requires some simple improvements, or should be deleted outright.

...

While this would be a discussion purely among admins so as to maintain neutrality, other Users would still be able to assist by bringing low quality articles to the attention of admins. There is no reason that all users can't discuss on something like this. The only thing I would restrict to admins is the actual nomination of articles. This way people can't just put an article up out of a grudge. They have to get it approved first.