Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4748628-20130529210815/@comment-1272757-20130603074259

Not going to turn this into a subject about perma-banned Users, so I'm going to leave that at hard-line critiques doesn't need to be harsh. Even so, when admins were more capable of acting on individual judgment of quality we had fewer articles (granted fewer people as well). But on the flipside, less restrictions on admin behavior and quality control allowed for more bias and power abuse, which is hardly preferable to questionable quality.

Again, it seems what we really need is some balance. And most likely some additional admins as well. Fortunately with Summer right around the corner most of us will have more time to be active and help the wiki, administrators or not. We've gone between loose and low quality to hardline and stressful; if we want to genuinely help this wiki, we most certainly need to find a definitive balance that improves quality without impacting the community's creativity.