User blog:E-113:Xi/Corruption/Confidence Amendment

I think most of us are aware by now of the recent Confidence Call against Kagimizu. Well I've been examining that call and its aftermath very closely for a few days now. Though I agree with its end, I don't believe that the means were very just. I'll get straight to the point, and say that I want to make some changes to the Policy regarding Corruption/Confidence calls which will hopefully ensure that these go much more smoothly in the future.

Any admin or bureaucrat may be called out by a user of the community for either Corruption or Confidence. Corruption will apply when the authority figure in question has broken a policy/policies. Confidence will apply when the community believes the authority figure in question is no longer capable of performing their duties with competence and good effect.

A Call must fulfill all of the following requirements from start to finish:
 * One bureaucrat and/or two administrators must verify the call before it can be put up for vote.
 * A Corruption call must include recent evidence of the authority figure in question breaking policy for it to be considered valid.
 * An authority figure deleting evidence against them is to be reported immediately to another administrator or bureaucrat, as it is considered breaking policy.
 * The accuser and accused may not converse anywhere on the wiki throughout the duration of the Call. If any user witnesses the two conversing on the wiki, it must be reported immediately to another administrator or bureaucrat.
 * Voting on the call will remain open until 20 total votes have been counted (with reasons), or one side receives a 10-vote lead. These numbers may be altered by the authority figure running the voting process.
 * Any vote for or against the Call must be given with reason. Reasons may include any piece of evidence for or against the accused, past or present.
 * If the authority figure in question loses the vote, they must be demoted as soon as possible, and will not be allowed their position back unless voted in at the next election.
 * A single authority figure may only be called out once every three months.

As you can see, there aren't a large number of changes to the existing policies. However, the changes I have made with surely work to great affect in the future of dealing with these calls. I ask briefly for opinions on these changes, before they are put up for vote.