Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-1272757-20130627003540/@comment-1272757-20130707071907

Gamedezyner wrote: Kagimizu wrote: I feel like the article being fixed as a community requires more detail. Quality is important, but I feel uncomfortable with changing someone else's article without the owner's consent or input. If that happens, it's not so much their article anymore, is it? So perhaps something about the User being given the ultimatum of either getting help or have the article deleted. I dunno, something like that. By putting an article up where anyone can edit it, they kind of automatically agree to the concept.

I strongly disagree with that thought process. Just because anyone can edit a page, doesn't mean they should. If someone changed any of my characters in a manner they thought superior, I would still get on their case for editing my stuff without permission. That's why the owner should at least have some choice in the matter. Either way, the article is either improved or simply deleted. Basically a win-win, right?