Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-27765057-20140105231113/@comment-5142578-20140107221459

TheSkullWolf wrote: Frost the Wolf wrote:

I'm not a hundred percent on board with this idea, but I don't necessarily hate it either. I think there is room for improvement. For example, rather than doing one article per month, I think it should be at least five articles per month (Like top 5 articles per month). The reason I say that is because there are so many more articles than users. I mean, like a "1 user per 200+ articles" ratio. So, I think naturally it would be a good idea to have more than just one article examined per month. I have a problem with this idea. First of all, we would have to have a much larger poll if five articles are going to be chosen, and I think a larger poll would just overwhelm everyone. Second, putting up 5 article reveiws (or whatever we are deciding to do) would take up a LOT of space. Like, a huge amount of space.

Plus, I think that we could take advantage of the fact that there are a lot of articles. It would keep articles from reappearing on the polls too often.

I guess you have a point there... What about only TWO articles per month? That way, out of the list of articles voted for, it would be first and second place that get the spotlight. And, it won't take up as much space as five articles. Does that work?