User blog comment:Wh!te$tar/It's called "Checks and Balances"/@comment-1272757-20110802025708/@comment-1272757-20110802031428

Alright. Here's an addition to the idea:
 * 1: The user calling corruption must give a specific reason, selecting one of the aforementioned violations.
 * 2: Corruption caller MUST link the location where said violation occured.
 * 3: The call has a period of 3-5 days, giving ample time for votes to be cast.

If you use those, then I don't see how this is a problem.