Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-4748628-20140501202747/@comment-24350564-20140504183821

BlackJackBlack wrote: Now that I think about it more, do we really...need to do this? Yeah, it's abused, but why is that an issue? An incomplete page is an isolated thing, on it's own little article, safely secluded from the rest of the wiki. It's not like we have to make this an overriding concern. The new word mark? Cool, spruces things up. A whole wiki cleanup? I don't really see much of a point to it. I could see removing edits with a bunch of profanity or hate speech, but incomplete articles seem pretty harmless. They just take up space. Also, if no one looks after those pages then they may as well be removed :p accepting any old article just because it has a construction template on it makes us seem like we hold no standards.