Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25127724-20140403190330/@comment-1942179-20140404154618

Chamesthehero wrote: Hmm... what's the point of the Most Interesting Character caterogy when the Best Character one is around? Aren't both almost the same thing? Characters in the Best Character category are already being judged based on originality of the character concept, design, history... so I don't see the point of making a very similar category with a different name. I agree. That's basically how Best Character works. Most interesting is a bit redundant in that sense.