Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-7637833-20150313032008/@comment-7637833-20150313041959

Kagimizu wrote: So.... let me get this straight. There is no actual rule that says it is mandatory I get feedback or commentary on who I select for nominations. But you and Minato, whose only job is to make sure the interview is on time in case I cannot do my job, think it is unfair that you get any say in who I pick for the nominations, despite the fact that you have never asked me for any such input when you completed the interview?

And then, rather than try and discuss it with me, either via talkpage or requesting we talk on the wiki chat, you decide I should be forced out of the position entirely. And I don't even find out via notification from either you or Minato, I have to be told by someone else over Skype!

Do you have even the vaguest idea how offended and disgusted I am right now?

I (and I assume Minato as well, feel free to correct me) was under the impression that since you're consistently late, we could take the matter into our own hands. Nobody's complained so far, which seems okay. Also, since you're rarely active as I've said, I have no idea when to contact you. For all I know, I could talk to you today, and end up getting a reply a week later. Hyperbole, maybe, but you get the gist I think.

As others have said, it'd be in the community's interest (I wonder if that's the right phrase) to be informed and discuss what to do. I know how you feel, but my point still stands.