Board Thread:Wiki Improvement/@comment-27765057-20140126203813

This is an idea that I came up with while figuring out who would make a good chat moderator in the next election (Because it seems that the number of active chat moderators is still pretty low in my opinion). Basically, this would allow us to elect users for admin/chat moderators without having to wait for an admin to start an entire election (which only really happens once or twice a year, from what I've seen). If someone thought that a user deserved a title, they would post a forum/blog stating what title they believe the user deserved to be promoted to along with their reasoning as to why. The requirements for a user to be considered for their own election are as follows:
 * The user in question must show consent.
 * The user in question must be active.
 * The user in question must fit all of the requirements for the title in question.
 * On the forum/blog, at least three users must agree with the possibility of promotion and must include their reasons as to why they agree.
 * For the position of chat moderator, at least current moderators must approve. For the position of admin, at least two current admins must approve. For the position of bureaucrat, the user in question must already be an admin and be approved by at least three current admins.
 * A specific user can only be allowed to be recommended once per every two months. During that time, the user cannot be nominated during an official election.
 * All of the above requirements must be fulfilled within a week of the recommendation blog. If those requirements are not fulfilled in time, then the recommendation is disproved and the blog must be deleted.
 * Assuming that all requirements are fulfilled in time, then a voting blog shall be created with a voting period of two weeks. If the user gains majority votes (with included reasons) then they shall be promoted.

So let me know if you think this is a good idea or not. Feel free to add suggestions. 